VILLAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

87

22%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

99

25%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

95

26%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

138

39%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.