PENN YAN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

129

27%

LEVEL 2

131

27%

LEVEL 3

144

30%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

117

23%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

90

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

119

27%

LEVEL 2

119

27%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

135

28%

LEVEL 4

85

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

138

34%

LEVEL 4

72

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

88

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

57

75%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

47

67%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

50

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

100

37%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

228
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

113

23%

LEVEL 2

160

32%

LEVEL 3

139

28%

LEVEL 4

89

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.