BAY TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

70

10%

LEVEL 2

161

24%

LEVEL 3

240

35%

LEVEL 4

207

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

498
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

61

9%

LEVEL 2

144

20%

LEVEL 3

268

38%

LEVEL 4

230

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

256
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

79

22%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

123

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

225
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

121

36%

LEVEL 4

104

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

242
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

65

19%

LEVEL 3

135

40%

LEVEL 4

107

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

14

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

380
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

132

24%

LEVEL 3

204

37%

LEVEL 4

176

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

411
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

112

20%

LEVEL 3

220

39%

LEVEL 4

191

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

9

22%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

19

46%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

435
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

47

7%

LEVEL 2

146

23%

LEVEL 3

230

37%

LEVEL 4

205

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

42

6%

LEVEL 2

128

20%

LEVEL 3

252

39%

LEVEL 4

226

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

496
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

58

8%

LEVEL 2

142

20%

LEVEL 3

267

38%

LEVEL 4

229

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

386
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

128

23%

LEVEL 3

206

37%

LEVEL 4

180

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

425
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

108

19%

LEVEL 3

222

39%

LEVEL 4

203

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

33

26%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

27

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.