Skip to Content
Main content

YORKTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

723
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,226

LEVEL 1

172

14%

LEVEL 2

331

27%

LEVEL 3

398

32%

LEVEL 4

325

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

846
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,308

LEVEL 1

153

12%

LEVEL 2

309

24%

LEVEL 3

434

33%

LEVEL 4

412

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

340
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

172

30%

LEVEL 3

187

33%

LEVEL 4

153

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

423
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

60

10%

LEVEL 2

148

23%

LEVEL 3

224

35%

LEVEL 4

199

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

383
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

109

17%

LEVEL 2

159

24%

LEVEL 3

211

32%

LEVEL 4

172

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

423
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

93

14%

LEVEL 2

161

24%

LEVEL 3

210

31%

LEVEL 4

213

31%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

61

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

91
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

63

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

501
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

99

12%

LEVEL 2

236

28%

LEVEL 3

293

35%

LEVEL 4

208

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

579
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 897

LEVEL 1

97

11%

LEVEL 2

221

25%

LEVEL 3

307

34%

LEVEL 4

272

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

9

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

704
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,070

LEVEL 1

74

7%

LEVEL 2

292

27%

LEVEL 3

386

36%

LEVEL 4

318

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

830
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,166

LEVEL 1

74

6%

LEVEL 2

262

22%

LEVEL 3

422

36%

LEVEL 4

408

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

98

63%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

79

56%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

715
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,196

LEVEL 1

159

13%

LEVEL 2

322

27%

LEVEL 3

391

33%

LEVEL 4

324

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

838
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,280

LEVEL 1

143

11%

LEVEL 2

299

23%

LEVEL 3

427

33%

LEVEL 4

411

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

663
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,077

LEVEL 1

125

12%

LEVEL 2

289

27%

LEVEL 3

353

33%

LEVEL 4

310

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

769
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,159

LEVEL 1

117

10%

LEVEL 2

273

24%

LEVEL 3

380

33%

LEVEL 4

389

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.