VAN CORTLANDTVILLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

52

21%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

77

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

42

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

35

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

46

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

37

37%

LEVEL 4

30

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

26

37%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

76

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

58

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

33

75%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

34

69%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

116
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

58

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

62

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

51

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

27

34%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.