Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 29 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

150

46%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

106

34%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

66

44%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

84

47%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

11

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

54

52%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

43

42%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

72

48%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

129

44%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

27

66%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

132

44%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

110
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

19

36%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

21

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

131

48%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

86

38%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

149

46%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

103

34%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.