ENRICO FERMI SCHOOL-PERF ARTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

372

54%

LEVEL 2

191

28%

LEVEL 3

94

14%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

334

49%

LEVEL 2

185

27%

LEVEL 3

104

15%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

175

51%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

158

46%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

197

58%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

176

53%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

15

71%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

23

49%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

331

55%

LEVEL 2

169

28%

LEVEL 3

79

13%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

133
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

296

50%

LEVEL 2

167

28%

LEVEL 3

85

14%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

329

52%

LEVEL 2

185

29%

LEVEL 3

91

14%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

291

46%

LEVEL 2

181

29%

LEVEL 3

102

16%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

43

83%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

43

88%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

132

37%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

240

74%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

14

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

236

72%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

14

4%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

359

54%

LEVEL 2

183

28%

LEVEL 3

90

14%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

306

49%

LEVEL 2

172

27%

LEVEL 3

99

16%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

369

54%

LEVEL 2

188

28%

LEVEL 3

94

14%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

329

49%

LEVEL 2

182

27%

LEVEL 3

103

15%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.