Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 22 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

122

51%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

101

42%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

58

50%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

64

52%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

54

45%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

28

53%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

71

53%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

56

44%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

103

47%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

19

86%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

25

83%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

80

38%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

17

81%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

21

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

101

56%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

79

50%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.