Skip to Content
Main content

EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS MICROSOCIETY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

126

33%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

131

34%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

68

36%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

132
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

108

33%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

125

37%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

27

66%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

88

29%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

42

50%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

43

56%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

121

34%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.