Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 21 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

106

41%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

47

41%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

63

44%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

53

40%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

21

35%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

22

36%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

20

56%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

56

42%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

56

42%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

77

38%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

31

67%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

23

55%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

18

29%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

95

43%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

82

45%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.