Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT C DODSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

373

60%

LEVEL 2

145

23%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

341

56%

LEVEL 2

151

25%

LEVEL 3

90

15%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

195

60%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

175

56%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

178

60%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

166

56%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

341

62%

LEVEL 2

127

23%

LEVEL 3

71

13%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

297

56%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

78

15%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

306

56%

LEVEL 2

143

26%

LEVEL 3

79

14%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

264

51%

LEVEL 2

142

27%

LEVEL 3

87

17%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

67

88%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

77

87%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

131

39%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

242

84%

LEVEL 2

33

11%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

212

79%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

41

51%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

361

61%

LEVEL 2

137

23%

LEVEL 3

77

13%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

300

57%

LEVEL 2

133

25%

LEVEL 3

76

14%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

366

59%

LEVEL 2

143

23%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

337

56%

LEVEL 2

149

25%

LEVEL 3

89

15%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.