Skip to Content
Main content

RIDGEWAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

101

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

93

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

49

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

53

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

44

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

40

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

42

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

88
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

101

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

93

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

24

75%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

165
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

97

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

41

17%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

91

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

26

54%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

71

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

67

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

48

34%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.