Skip to Content
Main content

SCARSDALE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,852
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,108

LEVEL 1

51

2%

LEVEL 2

205

10%

LEVEL 3

649

31%

LEVEL 4

1,203

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,866
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,117

LEVEL 1

51

2%

LEVEL 2

200

9%

LEVEL 3

651

31%

LEVEL 4

1,215

57%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

880
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,007

LEVEL 1

28

3%

LEVEL 2

99

10%

LEVEL 3

337

33%

LEVEL 4

543

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

881
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,020

LEVEL 1

31

3%

LEVEL 2

108

11%

LEVEL 3

313

31%

LEVEL 4

568

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

972
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,101

LEVEL 1

23

2%

LEVEL 2

106

10%

LEVEL 3

312

28%

LEVEL 4

660

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

985
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,097

LEVEL 1

20

2%

LEVEL 2

92

8%

LEVEL 3

338

31%

LEVEL 4

647

59%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

119
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

85

65%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

128
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

87

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

432
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

15

3%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

349

77%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

467
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

15

3%

LEVEL 3

98

20%

LEVEL 4

369

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,176
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,372

LEVEL 1

39

3%

LEVEL 2

157

11%

LEVEL 3

483

35%

LEVEL 4

693

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,135
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,328

LEVEL 1

33

2%

LEVEL 2

160

12%

LEVEL 3

452

34%

LEVEL 4

683

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

110
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

70

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

120
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

50

37%

LEVEL 4

70

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,811
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,983

LEVEL 1

14

1%

LEVEL 2

158

8%

LEVEL 3

619

31%

LEVEL 4

1,192

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,800
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,980

LEVEL 1

18

1%

LEVEL 2

162

8%

LEVEL 3

608

31%

LEVEL 4

1,192

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

41
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

66
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,820
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,072

LEVEL 1

49

2%

LEVEL 2

203

10%

LEVEL 3

637

31%

LEVEL 4

1,183

57%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,840
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,084

LEVEL 1

48

2%

LEVEL 2

196

9%

LEVEL 3

638

31%

LEVEL 4

1,202

58%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

20

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

13

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.