SCARSDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

887
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,040

LEVEL 1

28

3%

LEVEL 2

125

12%

LEVEL 3

343

33%

LEVEL 4

544

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

891
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,041

LEVEL 1

28

3%

LEVEL 2

122

12%

LEVEL 3

318

31%

LEVEL 4

573

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

429
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

51

10%

LEVEL 3

178

36%

LEVEL 4

251

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

439
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

55

11%

LEVEL 3

154

30%

LEVEL 4

285

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

458
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

74

14%

LEVEL 3

165

30%

LEVEL 4

293

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

452
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

13

2%

LEVEL 2

67

13%

LEVEL 3

164

31%

LEVEL 4

288

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

48
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

36

64%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

54
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

36

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

208
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

161

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

221
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

170

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

567
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

20

3%

LEVEL 2

95

14%

LEVEL 3

258

38%

LEVEL 4

309

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

553
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

94

14%

LEVEL 3

219

33%

LEVEL 4

334

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

33

49%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

869
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 978

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

103

11%

LEVEL 3

330

34%

LEVEL 4

539

55%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

861
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 970

LEVEL 1

12

1%

LEVEL 2

97

10%

LEVEL 3

299

31%

LEVEL 4

562

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

22

35%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

874
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,026

LEVEL 1

28

3%

LEVEL 2

124

12%

LEVEL 3

339

33%

LEVEL 4

535

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

885
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,031

LEVEL 1

26

3%

LEVEL 2

120

12%

LEVEL 3

314

30%

LEVEL 4

571

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

9

64%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.