Skip to Content
Main content

BRUNO M PONTERIO RIDGE STREET SCHOO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

157

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

158

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

79

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

71

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

78

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

87

54%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

11

58%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

17

77%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

20

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

117

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

111

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

12

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

15

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

156

54%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

155

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

249
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

37

12%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

154

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

257
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

154

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

37

12%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

156

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

37

12%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

156

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.