Skip to Content
Main content

RYE NECK UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

403
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

122

21%

LEVEL 3

183

31%

LEVEL 4

220

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

406
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

116

20%

LEVEL 3

164

29%

LEVEL 4

242

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

57

21%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

97

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

182
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

104

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

210
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

123

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

224
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

138

44%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

19

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

19

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

27

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

34

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

150

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

160

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

106

20%

LEVEL 3

179

34%

LEVEL 4

218

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

396
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

103

20%

LEVEL 3

157

30%

LEVEL 4

239

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

27

55%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

23

50%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

388
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

117

21%

LEVEL 3

174

31%

LEVEL 4

214

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

391
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

109

20%

LEVEL 3

158

29%

LEVEL 4

233

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

372
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

95

19%

LEVEL 3

160

32%

LEVEL 4

212

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

370
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

83

17%

LEVEL 3

144

30%

LEVEL 4

226

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.