Skip to Content
Main content

F E BELLOWS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

131

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

149

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

62

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

59

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

69

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

90

52%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

12

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

10

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

17

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

22

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

88

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

97

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

19

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

130

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

146

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

227
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

59

19%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

129

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

221
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

143

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

124

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

139

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.