Skip to Content
Main content

OSBORN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

116

39%

LEVEL 4

120

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

107

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

54

37%

LEVEL 4

53

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

51

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

62

40%

LEVEL 4

67

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

56

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

27

75%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

24

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

98

42%

LEVEL 4

83

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

68

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

10

42%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

112

40%

LEVEL 4

120

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

107

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

222
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

44

15%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

109

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

181
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

97

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

43

15%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

118

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

105

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.