PELHAM UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

782
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,081

LEVEL 1

99

9%

LEVEL 2

200

19%

LEVEL 3

371

34%

LEVEL 4

411

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

769
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,086

LEVEL 1

108

10%

LEVEL 2

209

19%

LEVEL 3

376

35%

LEVEL 4

393

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

371
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

100

20%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

196

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

357
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

93

18%

LEVEL 3

177

35%

LEVEL 4

180

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

411
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

58

10%

LEVEL 2

100

18%

LEVEL 3

196

34%

LEVEL 4

215

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

412
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

55

9%

LEVEL 2

116

20%

LEVEL 3

199

34%

LEVEL 4

213

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

58
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

33

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

62
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

25

34%

LEVEL 4

37

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

40

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

537
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

46

6%

LEVEL 2

143

20%

LEVEL 3

242

33%

LEVEL 4

295

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

524
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

56

8%

LEVEL 2

134

19%

LEVEL 3

246

34%

LEVEL 4

278

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

28

42%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

63

39%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

755
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 976

LEVEL 1

55

6%

LEVEL 2

166

17%

LEVEL 3

348

36%

LEVEL 4

407

42%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

745
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 983

LEVEL 1

58

6%

LEVEL 2

180

18%

LEVEL 3

359

37%

LEVEL 4

386

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

44

42%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

50

49%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

782
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,073

LEVEL 1

93

9%

LEVEL 2

198

18%

LEVEL 3

371

35%

LEVEL 4

411

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

765
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,073

LEVEL 1

103

10%

LEVEL 2

205

19%

LEVEL 3

373

35%

LEVEL 4

392

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

735
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 988

LEVEL 1

75

8%

LEVEL 2

178

18%

LEVEL 3

338

34%

LEVEL 4

397

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

722
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 981

LEVEL 1

75

8%

LEVEL 2

184

19%

LEVEL 3

340

35%

LEVEL 4

382

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.