Skip to Content
Main content

PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

118

24%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

161

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

111

23%

LEVEL 3

169

35%

LEVEL 4

153

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

81

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

78

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

80

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

75

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

15

54%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

16

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

19

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

12

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

210
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

113

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

110

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

31

41%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

24

34%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

141

33%

LEVEL 4

160

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

160

37%

LEVEL 4

150

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

321
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

108

23%

LEVEL 3

168

36%

LEVEL 4

153

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

293
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

138

32%

LEVEL 4

155

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

303
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

98

23%

LEVEL 3

153

35%

LEVEL 4

150

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

15

32%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

16

34%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.