OAKSIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

55

41%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

57

33%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

70

34%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

20

80%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

62

40%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

28

37%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

30

39%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

82
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.