ROOSEVELT SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

103

36%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

106

38%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

56

42%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

47

31%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

21

43%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

19

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

82

44%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

83

47%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

85

34%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

18

78%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

84

32%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

75

31%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

19

70%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

31

82%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

33

37%

LEVEL 4

22

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

31

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

93

47%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

90

51%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.