Skip to Content
Main content

BYRAM HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

694
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 883

LEVEL 1

50

6%

LEVEL 2

139

16%

LEVEL 3

306

35%

LEVEL 4

388

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

782
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 949

LEVEL 1

37

4%

LEVEL 2

130

14%

LEVEL 3

310

33%

LEVEL 4

472

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

330
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

74

17%

LEVEL 3

155

36%

LEVEL 4

175

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

373
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

72

16%

LEVEL 3

157

34%

LEVEL 4

216

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

364
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

65

14%

LEVEL 3

151

34%

LEVEL 4

213

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

409
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

58

12%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

256

53%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

14

56%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

17

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

44

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

54

73%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

560
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 721

LEVEL 1

44

6%

LEVEL 2

117

16%

LEVEL 3

255

35%

LEVEL 4

305

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

633
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 771

LEVEL 1

29

4%

LEVEL 2

109

14%

LEVEL 3

267

35%

LEVEL 4

366

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

23

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

33

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

661
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

94

12%

LEVEL 3

282

37%

LEVEL 4

379

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

739
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 837

LEVEL 1

9

1%

LEVEL 2

89

11%

LEVEL 3

279

33%

LEVEL 4

460

55%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

38

33%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

43
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

28

25%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

667
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 843

LEVEL 1

45

5%

LEVEL 2

131

16%

LEVEL 3

290

34%

LEVEL 4

377

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

751
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 903

LEVEL 1

32

4%

LEVEL 2

120

13%

LEVEL 3

296

33%

LEVEL 4

455

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

17

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

778
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 944

LEVEL 1

37

4%

LEVEL 2

129

14%

LEVEL 3

307

33%

LEVEL 4

471

50%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.