ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

132

29%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

126

27%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

130

28%

LEVEL 2

126

27%

LEVEL 3

124

27%

LEVEL 4

85

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

84

31%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

52

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

59

47%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

56

45%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

99

24%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

62

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

46

78%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

188
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

112

26%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

208
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

118

26%

LEVEL 2

122

27%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

20

83%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

105

34%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

76

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

73

48%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

67

48%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.