GRAHAM SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

130

53%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

115

51%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

57

51%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

51

45%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

73

54%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

64

57%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

111

52%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

101

53%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

92

46%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

85

45%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

30

79%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

122

52%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

106

51%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

19

40%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

111

56%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

91

54%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

115

52%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.