LINCOLN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

68

19%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

80

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

89

22%

LEVEL 4

90

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

32

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

35

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

80

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

89

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

27

54%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

23

68%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

89

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

22

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

32

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

170
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

90

24%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

87

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.