PLEASANTVILLE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

483
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

62

9%

LEVEL 2

130

19%

LEVEL 3

202

30%

LEVEL 4

281

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

485
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

61

9%

LEVEL 2

129

19%

LEVEL 3

199

29%

LEVEL 4

286

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

237
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

134

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

130

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

246
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

67

19%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

147

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

263
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

156

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

11

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

18

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

25

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

26

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

393
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

95

18%

LEVEL 3

168

32%

LEVEL 4

225

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

389
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

91

17%

LEVEL 3

171

33%

LEVEL 4

218

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

22

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

86

15%

LEVEL 3

194

33%

LEVEL 4

278

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

468
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

28

5%

LEVEL 2

96

16%

LEVEL 3

187

32%

LEVEL 4

281

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

38

41%

LEVEL 2

44

47%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

33

40%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

480
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 659

LEVEL 1

55

8%

LEVEL 2

124

19%

LEVEL 3

200

30%

LEVEL 4

280

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

479
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

49

8%

LEVEL 2

125

19%

LEVEL 3

197

30%

LEVEL 4

282

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

451
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

45

7%

LEVEL 2

105

17%

LEVEL 3

188

31%

LEVEL 4

263

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

455
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

108

18%

LEVEL 3

183

30%

LEVEL 4

272

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

17

23%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

18

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

22

30%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.