Skip to Content
Main content

KENSICO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

71

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

40

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

9

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

12

55%

LEVEL 4

6

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

23

25%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

33

37%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

101

37%

LEVEL 4

69

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

29

73%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

135
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

101

36%

LEVEL 4

71

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

18

29%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.