VALHALLA UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

114

21%

LEVEL 2

167

31%

LEVEL 3

160

30%

LEVEL 4

100

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

97

17%

LEVEL 2

142

25%

LEVEL 3

192

33%

LEVEL 4

144

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

79

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

21

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

21

46%

LEVEL 4

19

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

84

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

154

32%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

99

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

186

36%

LEVEL 4

141

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

50

75%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

37

60%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

259
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

100

19%

LEVEL 2

160

31%

LEVEL 3

159

31%

LEVEL 4

100

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

332
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

82

15%

LEVEL 2

134

24%

LEVEL 3

188

34%

LEVEL 4

144

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

79

18%

LEVEL 2

129

29%

LEVEL 3

137

31%

LEVEL 4

94

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

56

12%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

165

36%

LEVEL 4

132

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.