COLUMBUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

156

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

126

32%

LEVEL 4

167

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

72

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

72

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

84

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

95

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

14

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

17

77%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

125

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

133

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

23

41%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

16

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

154

46%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

163

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

17

37%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

275
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

66

18%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

155

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

289
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

165

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

65

18%

LEVEL 3

114

32%

LEVEL 4

150

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

279
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

161

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.