Skip to Content
Main content

HARRISON AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

128

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

128

54%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

65

52%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

50

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

63

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

78

60%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

31

89%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

20

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

89

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

96

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

128

57%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

128

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

188
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

72

32%

LEVEL 4

116

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

177
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

119

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

12

71%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

9

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

120

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

122

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.