CHATSWORTH AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

188

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

53

16%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

175

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

89

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

70

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

99

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

105

62%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

236
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

161

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

141

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

11

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

13

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

37

12%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

184

59%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

169

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

273
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

40

12%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

188

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

263
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

53

16%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

173

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

265
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

185

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

260
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

175

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.