GREENVILLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

146

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

28

9%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

171

56%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

69

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

82

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

77

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

89

57%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

10

67%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

88
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

73

81%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

112
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

87

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

59

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

63

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

33

13%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

143

57%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

166

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

17

49%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

269
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

26

9%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

168

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.