ARDSLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

410
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

82

15%

LEVEL 3

157

28%

LEVEL 4

253

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

418
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

89

16%

LEVEL 3

173

30%

LEVEL 4

245

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

180
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

110

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

39

15%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

112

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

230
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

143

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

225
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

133

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

11

48%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

124
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

13

9%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

98

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

123
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

86

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

215
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

119

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

123

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

12

17%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

25

35%

LEVEL 4

24

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

20

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

395
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

75

15%

LEVEL 3

146

29%

LEVEL 4

249

50%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

80

15%

LEVEL 3

166

31%

LEVEL 4

243

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

27

55%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

25

58%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

405
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

80

15%

LEVEL 3

155

29%

LEVEL 4

250

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

395
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

75

15%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

246

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

399
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

78

15%

LEVEL 3

159

30%

LEVEL 4

240

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

407
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

80

15%

LEVEL 3

154

28%

LEVEL 4

253

46%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.