Skip to Content
Main content

CONCORD ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

58

19%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

110

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

65

20%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

140

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

53

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

55

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

57

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

85

52%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

11

73%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

39

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

53

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

52

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

61

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

13

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

106

37%

LEVEL 4

109

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

139

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

225
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

110

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

109

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

133

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.