HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

89

17%

LEVEL 3

209

40%

LEVEL 4

184

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

435
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

49

8%

LEVEL 2

122

20%

LEVEL 3

186

31%

LEVEL 4

249

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

111

43%

LEVEL 4

78

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

220
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

125

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

106

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

215
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

53

18%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

124

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

18

51%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

37
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

18

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

15

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

307
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

58

15%

LEVEL 3

165

42%

LEVEL 4

142

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

333
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

81

18%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

197

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

18

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

77

16%

LEVEL 3

199

41%

LEVEL 4

179

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

420
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

109

20%

LEVEL 3

175

32%

LEVEL 4

245

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

27

49%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

433
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

115

19%

LEVEL 3

184

31%

LEVEL 4

249

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

387
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

84

17%

LEVEL 3

204

40%

LEVEL 4

183

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

431
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

114

19%

LEVEL 3

183

31%

LEVEL 4

248

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.