BRONXVILLE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

615
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

37

5%

LEVEL 2

99

13%

LEVEL 3

237

32%

LEVEL 4

378

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

632
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 744

LEVEL 1

39

5%

LEVEL 2

73

10%

LEVEL 3

236

32%

LEVEL 4

396

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

290
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

184

52%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

300
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

28

8%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

177

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

325
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

54

14%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

194

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

332
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

45

11%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

219

55%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

41
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

29

60%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

38

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

36

73%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

493
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

31

5%

LEVEL 2

83

14%

LEVEL 3

198

33%

LEVEL 4

295

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

504
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

59

10%

LEVEL 3

198

33%

LEVEL 4

306

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

20

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

606
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

86

12%

LEVEL 3

230

32%

LEVEL 4

376

53%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

624
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

20

3%

LEVEL 2

60

9%

LEVEL 3

230

33%

LEVEL 4

394

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

19

48%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

610
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 745

LEVEL 1

36

5%

LEVEL 2

99

13%

LEVEL 3

233

31%

LEVEL 4

377

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

613
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 744

LEVEL 1

37

5%

LEVEL 2

94

13%

LEVEL 3

235

32%

LEVEL 4

378

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

626
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

38

5%

LEVEL 2

70

10%

LEVEL 3

234

32%

LEVEL 4

392

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.