Skip to Content
Main content

BRONXVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

35

9%

LEVEL 3

130

34%

LEVEL 4

207

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

29

8%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

221

60%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

98

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

101

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

183
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

109

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

120

62%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

19

70%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

20

87%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

17

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

18

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

29

9%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

162

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

22

7%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

172

59%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

11

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

30

8%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

205

56%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

19

5%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

219

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

322
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

28

8%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

218

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.