Skip to Content
Main content

EASTCHESTER UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

947
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,302

LEVEL 1

101

8%

LEVEL 2

254

20%

LEVEL 3

456

35%

LEVEL 4

491

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

983
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,315

LEVEL 1

86

7%

LEVEL 2

246

19%

LEVEL 3

464

35%

LEVEL 4

519

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

439
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

107

18%

LEVEL 3

218

37%

LEVEL 4

221

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

484
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

104

17%

LEVEL 3

228

37%

LEVEL 4

256

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

508
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

55

8%

LEVEL 2

147

21%

LEVEL 3

238

34%

LEVEL 4

270

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

499
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

57

8%

LEVEL 2

142

20%

LEVEL 3

236

34%

LEVEL 4

263

38%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

49
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

19

34%

LEVEL 4

30

54%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

54
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

25

37%

LEVEL 4

29

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

187
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

141

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

205
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

139

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

605
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 851

LEVEL 1

66

8%

LEVEL 2

180

21%

LEVEL 3

326

38%

LEVEL 4

279

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

618
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 843

LEVEL 1

62

7%

LEVEL 2

163

19%

LEVEL 3

322

38%

LEVEL 4

296

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

38

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

51

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

912
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,166

LEVEL 1

52

4%

LEVEL 2

202

17%

LEVEL 3

428

37%

LEVEL 4

484

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

936
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,162

LEVEL 1

38

3%

LEVEL 2

188

16%

LEVEL 3

427

37%

LEVEL 4

509

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

48

31%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

899
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,229

LEVEL 1

95

8%

LEVEL 2

235

19%

LEVEL 3

441

36%

LEVEL 4

458

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

923
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,245

LEVEL 1

85

7%

LEVEL 2

237

19%

LEVEL 3

437

35%

LEVEL 4

486

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

33

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

27

39%

LEVEL 4

33

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

941
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,292

LEVEL 1

100

8%

LEVEL 2

251

19%

LEVEL 3

452

35%

LEVEL 4

489

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

976
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,304

LEVEL 1

85

7%

LEVEL 2

243

19%

LEVEL 3

460

35%

LEVEL 4

516

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.