Skip to Content
Main content

ANNE HUTCHINSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

110

37%

LEVEL 4

92

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

115

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

38

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

66

46%

LEVEL 4

45

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

54

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

70

41%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

33

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

36

73%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

72

42%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

84

43%

LEVEL 4

60

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

90

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

112

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

190
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

84

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

214
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

100

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

15

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

119

38%

LEVEL 4

113

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.