KATONAH-LEWISBORO UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

884
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,139

LEVEL 1

67

6%

LEVEL 2

188

17%

LEVEL 3

369

32%

LEVEL 4

515

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

915
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,145

LEVEL 1

54

5%

LEVEL 2

176

15%

LEVEL 3

396

35%

LEVEL 4

519

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

431
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

85

16%

LEVEL 3

194

35%

LEVEL 4

237

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

436
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

84

15%

LEVEL 3

186

34%

LEVEL 4

250

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

453
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

103

17%

LEVEL 3

175

30%

LEVEL 4

278

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

479
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

92

15%

LEVEL 3

210

35%

LEVEL 4

269

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

47
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

32

53%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

52
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

25

40%

LEVEL 4

27

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

20

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

28

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

732
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 930

LEVEL 1

47

5%

LEVEL 2

151

16%

LEVEL 3

312

34%

LEVEL 4

420

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

743
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 925

LEVEL 1

37

4%

LEVEL 2

145

16%

LEVEL 3

326

35%

LEVEL 4

417

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

39

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

44

42%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

827
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 963

LEVEL 1

12

1%

LEVEL 2

124

13%

LEVEL 3

330

34%

LEVEL 4

497

52%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

855
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 974

LEVEL 1

11

1%

LEVEL 2

108

11%

LEVEL 3

349

36%

LEVEL 4

506

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

60
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

883
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,132

LEVEL 1

63

6%

LEVEL 2

186

16%

LEVEL 3

368

33%

LEVEL 4

515

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

846
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,074

LEVEL 1

58

5%

LEVEL 2

170

16%

LEVEL 3

349

32%

LEVEL 4

497

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

875
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,088

LEVEL 1

46

4%

LEVEL 2

167

15%

LEVEL 3

370

34%

LEVEL 4

505

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

18

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

26

46%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.