NORTH ROSE-WOLCOTT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

134

41%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

66

41%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

63

39%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

71

43%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

112

37%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

99

34%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

35

88%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

111
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

130

39%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

21

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

42

42%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

116

49%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

119

53%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

111
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

130

39%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

122

37%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

126

40%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.