PALMYRA-MACEDON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

211

33%

LEVEL 2

192

30%

LEVEL 3

168

26%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

243

37%

LEVEL 2

195

29%

LEVEL 3

164

25%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

106

34%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

116

32%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

194

33%

LEVEL 2

177

30%

LEVEL 3

155

26%

LEVEL 4

64

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

215
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

222

36%

LEVEL 2

180

29%

LEVEL 3

156

25%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

138

25%

LEVEL 2

177

32%

LEVEL 3

166

30%

LEVEL 4

67

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

182

31%

LEVEL 2

177

31%

LEVEL 3

159

27%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

73

80%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

61

73%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

115

32%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

135

48%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

147

50%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

224
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

239

36%

LEVEL 2

193

29%

LEVEL 3

163

25%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.