LYONS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

147

54%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

138

52%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

73

57%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

63

54%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

74

51%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

75

51%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

87

50%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

31

76%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

119

50%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

114

49%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

22

27%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

121

62%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

116

63%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

137

53%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

134

52%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.