LYONS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

200

55%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

200

55%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

92

55%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

94

56%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

108

55%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

106

55%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

23

50%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

23

55%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

123

51%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

132

53%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

39

80%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

148

49%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

155

50%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

52

90%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

45

87%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

46

40%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

46

37%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

154

63%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

154

65%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

188

54%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

196

55%

LEVEL 2

103

29%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.