CLYDE-SAVANNAH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

137

50%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

152

55%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

54

45%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

66

52%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

83

54%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

86

58%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

117

48%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

129

54%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

89

41%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

104

46%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

48

87%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

48

91%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

133

49%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

54

45%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

90

58%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

98

62%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.