NEWARK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

456

59%

LEVEL 2

197

25%

LEVEL 3

92

12%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 849

LEVEL 1

475

56%

LEVEL 2

216

25%

LEVEL 3

122

14%

LEVEL 4

36

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

213

58%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

232

56%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

243

60%

LEVEL 2

91

23%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

243

56%

LEVEL 2

109

25%

LEVEL 3

58

13%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

291

53%

LEVEL 2

152

28%

LEVEL 3

78

14%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

310

52%

LEVEL 2

151

25%

LEVEL 3

102

17%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

58

84%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

59

76%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

97

69%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

90

62%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 668

LEVEL 1

361

54%

LEVEL 2

188

28%

LEVEL 3

91

14%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

363

50%

LEVEL 2

209

29%

LEVEL 3

119

16%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

95

90%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

112

92%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

157
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 843

LEVEL 1

471

56%

LEVEL 2

215

26%

LEVEL 3

122

14%

LEVEL 4

35

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

134

46%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

137

44%

LEVEL 2

85

28%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

322

67%

LEVEL 2

104

22%

LEVEL 3

45

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

338

62%

LEVEL 2

131

24%

LEVEL 3

58

11%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

157
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 821

LEVEL 1

456

56%

LEVEL 2

208

25%

LEVEL 3

121

15%

LEVEL 4

36

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.