Skip to Content
Main content

CAMBRIDGE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

137

41%

LEVEL 3

101

30%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

64

38%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

133

42%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

106

40%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

80

39%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

33

27%

LEVEL 2

49

40%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

136

42%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.