Skip to Content
Main content

CAMBRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

48

43%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

25

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

89

41%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

33

39%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

107
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.