HUDSON FALLS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

158

39%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

135

35%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

72

37%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

72

37%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

141

39%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

116

34%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

100

31%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

58

73%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

57

71%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

118
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

131

35%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

54

26%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

81

47%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

132

35%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

150

38%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

117
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

130

35%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.